Legal Opinion

Henry A. Keith & Co. v. City of Du Quoin ex rel. Parks

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 16, 1900PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Assumpsit, for money paid, etc. Error to the Circuit Court of Perry County; the Hon. Benjamin B. Burroughs, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the August term, 1899.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding J ustice Bigelow

delivered the opinion of the court.

This is an action of assumpsit, brought by the city of Du Quoin on the relation of S. G. Parks, a tax payer in said city, against Henry A. Keith, doing business under the name of Henry A. Keith. & Co., under section 172 of chapter 24, Hurd’s R. S., 1899.

The facts are as follows: The fiscal year of the city of Du Quoin began August 1, 1897, and ended July 31, 1898. On September 18,1897, the city passed an ordinance appropriating, among other items of expenditure, the sum of $3,500 for “ water works.” On February 2, 1898, the city…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of East St. Louis v. East St. Louis Gas Light & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Maher v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  3. Brown v. City of AtchisonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1888
  4. Badger v. Inlet Drainage DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Wiley v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bank of Lowell v. CoxArizona Supreme Court · 1929
  2. McGillivray v. Joint School District No. 1Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Empire Voting Mach. Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920
  4. People ex rel. Mulvey v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  5. City of Chicago v. A. R. Beck Lumber Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API