Rose Ex Rel. Rose v. Nebraska
District Court, D. Nebraska
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RICHARD E. ROBINSON, Senior District Judge.
Marla Rose 1 and Daniel Monahan are handicapped children. Marla is deaf and her speech is impaired. Daniel has muscular dystrophy, he is currently confined to a wheelchair, and is mentally retarded.
In these two actions Marla and Daniel, through their respective next of friends, challenge the validity of certain portions of the Nebraska and federal statutes which relate to the education of handicapped children. See Neb.Rev.Stat. § 43-661 — 43-668 and 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq. Essentially, the plaintiffs are dissatisfied with the…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Dunn v. BlumsteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Golden v. ZwicklerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- DeFunis v. OdegaardSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Moore v. OgilvieSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Monahan v. State of NebraskaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Natrona County School District No. 1 v. RyanWyoming Supreme Court · 1988
- George Rose, as Next Friend of Marla Rose v. State of Nebraska, George Rose, as Next Friend of Marla Rose v. State of Nebraska, George Rose, as Next Friend of Marla Rose v. Charles ThoneCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Amelia County School Board v. Virginia Board of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1987
- ANTKOWIAK BY ANTKOWIAK v. AmbachDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1986
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.