Legal Opinion

State v. Kanda

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided December 17, 1980No. 6880PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

OGATA, J.

On September 1, 1977, the herein named seven defendants-appellants, Ruth Kanda, Masato Bentosino, David Waki, David Kim, Yoshio Tanaka, Kazuyoshi Yamanishi and Gordon Nagata (hereinafter appellants), were indicted by the Maui County Grand Jury and each was charged with the offense of possession of gambling records in the first degree in violation of HRS § 712-1224(1). The indictment returned against appellant Kazuyoshi Yamanishi contained an additional count which charged him with the offense of promoting gambling in the first degree in violation of HRS §…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Beck v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. KaleohanoHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  2. State v. SpillnerHawaii Supreme Court · 2007
  3. State v. TauaHawaii Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. SherlockHawaii Supreme Court · 1989
  5. State v. NavasHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 1995

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API