Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Moses v. Diocese of Colorado

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided November 15, 1993No. 92SA415Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partChief Justice Rovira

The majority holds that sufficient evidence was presented at trial to create a question for the jury regarding whether an employment or agency relationship existed between the Diocese of Colorado (diocese) and Father Paul Robinson and therefore, the diocese may be liable for the negligent hiring and supervision of Robinson.1 For the reasons set forth below, I disagree and, accordingly, respectfully dissent.

I

Mary Moses (plaintiff) was a parishioner at St. Philip and St. James Episcopal Church. Father Vernon Meyers was the head priest and rector of that parish. Father Paul Robinson was employed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Stortroen v. Beneficial Finance Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1987
  3. United States v. Billy G. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1984
  4. Miller v. Hirschbach Motor Lines, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Montano v. Land Title Guarantee Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API