Legal Opinion

United States v. Billy G. Young

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided February 21, 1984No. 81-1536PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Per curiam

After examining the briefs and the appellate record, this three-judge panel has determined unanimously that oral argument would not be of material assistance in the determination of this appeal. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a); Tenth Circuit R. 10(e). The cause is therefore ordered submitted without oral argument.

Appellant Young, as vice-president and general manager of Compton Petroleum Corporation (Compton Petroleum), entered into a contract to sell crude oil to Apeo Oil Corporation in late 1976. Deliveries under the contract were made between January-1977 and September 1977; but what Apeo Oil…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Dutton v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  3. United States v. Juan G. RiosCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Stephen G. Scholle, United States of America v. Michael S. NeedhamCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  5. United States v. Vincent Pecelli, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1974

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. YoungSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Richard M. Lippay v. Dean C. Christos Commonwealth of Pa. Dean C. ChristosCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  3. Savarese v. AgrissCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Moses v. Diocese of ColoradoSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  5. United States v. Albert John Thame, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1988

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API