Legal Opinion

Buchholz v. Union Pacific Railroad Company

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided May 20, 1957No. 17811Published

1Opinion of the Court

311 P.2d 717 (1957)

Victor H. BUCHHOLZ, Plaintiff in Error,

v.

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Corporation, Defendant in Error.

No. 17811.

Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc.

May 20, 1957.

G. E. Hendricks, Julesburg, for plaintiff in error.

E. G. Knowles, Clayton D. Knowles, Denver, Richard D. Dittemore, Julesburg (W. R. Rouse, F. J. Melia, Omaha, Neb., of counsel), for defendant in error.

SUTTON, Justice.

This is an action in tort for damages. The parties appear here in the same order as in the trial court and will be so referred to herein.

Plaintiff's complaint alleged that defendant railroad on…

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Grand Trunk Railway Co. v. IvesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  2. Pokora v. Wabash Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Phillips v. Denver City Tramway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1912
  4. Nichols v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  5. Gossard v. WatsonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API