Legal Opinion

Comford v. Cantrell

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 14, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Green

The questions presented on this appeal involve the construction of two wills. First the will of James G. Cantrell and second the will of his wife, Clara Augusta Cantrell. The chancellor’s' decree was in favor of complainants and the defendants have appealed.

James G. Cantrell was the owner of valuable property on Fifth-Avenue in Nashville which he devised to his wife. She was advised that she took an estate in fee under her husband’s will and proceeded to dispose of the property by her will. Certain relatives of the husband, mentioned by his will in a connection that will hereafter appear,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Daly v. DalyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Anderson v. LucasTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Smith v. ReynoldsTennessee Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Ogilvie v. WrightTennessee Supreme Court · 1918
  5. Williams, Com'r. v. McFarlandTennessee Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Moore v. NeelyTennessee Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Byars v. ByarsTexas Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Nashville Electric Supply Co. v. Kay Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1975
  4. C. B. Huggins, Iv, of the Estates of Camillus B. Huggins and Augusta M. Huggins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
  5. Third Nat. Bank v. CohnTennessee Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API