Legal Opinion

Ogilvie v. Wright

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1918PublishedCited by 7 opinions

FROM SHELBY. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Shelby County. — HoN. FraNCIs FeNteess, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Williams

There is involved in this cause the construction of the will of J. C. Wright; the chief complainant being his niece and adopted daughter, and the chief defendant his widow.

The question for discussion is: Under the will and two codicils, did the defendant widow take a life estate, or an estate absolute, in the property affected?

So far as necessary to be quoted, the will, after providing for burial expenses and debts, recites:

*115“3. The residue of all my property — real, personal and mixed — in possession or in expectancy — consisting of real estate, household goods and other personal property of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Brant v. Virginia Coal & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Bradley v. CarnesTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Warren v. IngramMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Weiss v. Broadway National BankTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Erwin Nat. Bank v. RiddleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Treanor v. TreanorCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1941
  4. Daly v. DalyTennessee Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Miller v. GratzCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API