Legal Opinion
Homan Mfg. Co. v. Russo
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided June 6, 1956No. 11737_1PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
233 F.2d 547
56-1 USTC P 9527
HOMAN MFG. CO., Inc., a corporation, formerly named Shotwell
Mfg. Co., Byron A. Cain, Harold E. Sullivan and
Frank J. Huebner, Plaintiffs,
v.
Vincent P. RUSSO, Charles A. McNelis and Charles J. Mammel,
Defendants.
No. 11737.
United States Court of Appeals Seventh Circuit.
May 11, 1956.
Rehearing Denied June 6, 1956.
George B. Christensen, William T. Kirby, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.
Robert Tieken, U.S. Atty., John Peter Lulinski, Asst. U.S. Atty., Chicago, Ill., Vincent P. Russo, Charles A. McNelis, Sp. Attys., Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., pro sese, and Donald…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Silverthorne Lumber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
- Blair v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Cogen v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- United States v. Wallace & Tiernan Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In the Matter of the April 1956 Term Grand Jury. Byron A. Cain and Sally Cain v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
- In re the Grand Jury Investigation of Violations of 18 U.S.C. § 1621Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- No. 28193Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963