Legal Opinion

Nau v. Santa Ana Sugar Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 12, 1926No. Docket No. 4658PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

The plaintiff, as owner of the land, on or about May 27, 1920, leased the land to Sherman Buck for a term of three years, commencing January 1, 1921. The annual rental was to be $4,400, payable on October 1st during each year of the term. On October 29, 1920, Buck assigned the lease to J. W. Culver, subject to the terms and conditions of the said lease, and said Culver agreed to carry out all of the terms and conditions of the lease. This transfer was made with consent of the lessor. On November 15, 1920, a contract in writing was entered into between defendant company and J. W. Culver for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mitau v. RoddanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Title Insurance & Trust Co. v. California Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  4. London, Paris, & Am. Bank, Ltd. v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. McClure v. DonovanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Childs Real Estate Co. v. Shelburne Realty Co.California Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Washington Lumber & Millwork Co. v. McGuireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Okuda v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  5. Hise v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API