Legal Opinion
Charry v. California
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 18, 1994No. 92-55541PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FRANK A. KAUFMAN, Senior District Judge:
Guillermo Charry appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants with respect to Charry’s claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 that his equal protection and due process rights were violated when time spent on parole was not credited toward his sentence of confinement, allegedly resulting in Charry serving more time with the California Youth Authority (“CYA”) than a similarly situated youthful felon committed to adult custody would have been required to serve. Because we conclude that Charry did not serve any more time under CYA…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- David D. Darring v. Larry Kincheloe, Superintendent of the Washington State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Brian Barlow v. Officer George Ground, I.D. 9129Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- People v. SandovalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- People v. ReinertsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Charry v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Dan-Victor Balaesh v. Trinity Biotech, an Irish Public Limited CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
- People v. Hutton, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2016