Legal Opinion · Dissent

Gratzfeld v. Bomgaars Supply

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided July 24, 1986No. 14918Published

1DissentHenderson, Justice

I concur in that portion of the- majority opinion which concludes that Bomgaars Supply (Bomgaars) has waived its nonfatal jurisdiction contention by failing to comply with the notice of review requirements of SDCL 15-26A-22. From the remainder of the majority opinion, however, I dissent.

As the majority opinion notes, an unwritten policy existed which allowed Bomgaars’ employees to charge items for a short period of time. As the majority opinion fails to note, however, when items were removed from the store without being paid for, another store clerk was to prepare a charge slip for that…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In Re the Appeal & Hearing From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor, Unemployment Insurance Division, for YarochSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Matter of SD Water Mgmt. Bd.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kienast v. Sioux Valley Co-OpSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Matter of JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  5. In the Matter of the Appeal From the Final Decision of the South Dakota Department of Labor Unemployment Insurance Division for Carmen White, Appeal No. C-3046South Dakota Supreme Court · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API