Legal Opinion
Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's London v. Home Insurance
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided September 6, 2001No. 99-473PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroderick, J.
This case concerns a certificate of reinsurance (reinsurance policy) issued by the plaintiffs, Certain Underwriters *741at Lloyd’s London and other London reinsurers (collectively, London Reinsurers) to the defendant, The Home Insurance Company (Home). London Reinsurers refused to reimburse Home for a claim arising under its reinsurance policy and filed a declaratory judgment action to determine whether it was obligated to do so. The Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) ruled that Home breached the notice requirement of the reinsurance policy in bad faith and that London Reinsurers was, therefore, not…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- North River Insurance Company v. Cigna Reinsurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Unigard Security Insurance Company, Inc., Successor to Unigard Mutual Insurance Company, Inc. v. North River Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
- Christiania General Insurance Corporation of New York v. Great American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
- Unigard Security Insurance v. North River InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Gelinas v. Metropolitan Property & Liability InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1988
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Strike Four, LLC v. Nissan North America, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
- Munich Reinsurance America, Inc. v. American National InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Bouffard v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
- NewCap Insurance v. Employers Reinsurance Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
- United States Fire Insurance Company v. Unified Life Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 2024