Legal Opinion
Mohs v. Parrish's Bar
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided January 29, 1988No. C7-87-1668, CX-87-1714PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
AMDAHL, Chief Justice.
We answer a question certified to us pursuant to Rule 103.03(h) Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure. The plaintiffs, minor Jessica Mohs, and her mother as natural guardian, brought suit against the Bars 1 for injuries suffered when Jessica was struck by an automobile driven by Robert Norman Love, an uninsured motorist. The complaint alleges that the Bars illegally served intoxicating beverages to Love while he was obviously intoxicated.
The Mohs family did not own a motor vehicle and there was no policy in effect under which No-Fault benefits could be paid. Jessica…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Milbrandt v. American Legion Post of MoraSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Mickelson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
- Dahle v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. VanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Mueller v. TheisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1994
- Preferred Risk Mutual Insurance Co. v. PagelCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. VanmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989
- Banks v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.