Wilson v. Studebaker Corp. of America
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
At L,aw. Assumpsit by Orín S.- Wilson against the Studebaker Corporation of America. There was a verdict for plaintiff. Sur motion of defendant for new trial.
1Opinion of the Court
DICKINSON, District Judge.
A summary of the reasons for a new trial now urged and the rulings of this court thereon may be helpful in the' subsequent proceedings in the cause.
[1] 1. The cause of action was the breach of a contract to sell and deliver automobiles. The jury found a contract and its breach in the failure' or refusal of the defendant to deliver the automobiles agreed to be delivered. The parties' had had a similar contract covering the transactions of the previous year. During that year the plaintiff accepted and paid for a less number of automobiles than the number ordered. There…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Velie Motor Car Co. v. Kopmeier Motor Car Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Oakland Motor Car Co. v. Indiana Automobile Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Ellis v. Dodge Bros.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1916
3Cited by4 opinions
- Chevrolet Motor Co. v. McCullough Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1925
- Weil v. Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1919
- Jones v. Dumas Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950
- Jones v. Dumas Development Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1950