Legal Opinion

United States v. James

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 23, 1996No. Civil No. 95-0252-R. Criminal No. 90-1303-RPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE, OR CORRECT SENTENCE PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 2255

RHOADES, District Judge.

This matter comes before the Court on Petitioner Allen J. James’ motion pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct the sentence imposed by this Court. For the reasons given below, Petitioner’s motion is DENIED.

I. Background

On December 19, 1990, a federal grand jury returned a one-count indictment charging Petitioner James with possession with intent to distribute approximately one and one-half pounds of methamphetamine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). On…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Jack FAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, Secretary of Health and Human Services of the United States, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  3. Serfass v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. United States v. $405,089.23 U.S. Currency, Charles Arlt James Wren Payback Mines, Claimants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Santos v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1996
  2. United States v. Olmos-EsparzaDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API