United States v. Olmos-Esparza
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE
RHOADES, District Judge.
I. Overview
Petitioner Emigdio Olmos-Esparza has filed this Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is denied.
II. Background
On February 2, 1992 federal agents at the United States Border Control checkpoint in Temecula inspected Petitioner’s vehicle. They discovered five bags, each of which contained a controlled substance. One bag contained 6.041 grams of a substance containing methamphetamine. Another contained 72.3…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- United States v. Esparza-PonceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998