Legal Opinion

United States v. Olmos-Esparza

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 12, 1997No. Civil No. 97-0726. Criminal No. 92-0165PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION TO VACATE, SET ASIDE OR CORRECT SENTENCE

RHOADES, District Judge.

I. Overview

Petitioner Emigdio Olmos-Esparza has filed this Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255. For the reasons stated below, the Motion is denied.

II. Background

On February 2, 1992 federal agents at the United States Border Control checkpoint in Temecula inspected Petitioner’s vehicle. They discovered five bags, each of which contained a controlled substance. One bag contained 6.041 grams of a substance containing methamphetamine. Another contained 72.3…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. Kaufman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. Esparza-PonceDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API