Legal Opinion

City of Rockford v. Suski

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided September 2, 1999No. 2-98-0893, 2-98-0894 consPublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Geiger

Harold Suski appeals from the June 19, 1998, order of the circuit court of Winnebago County denying his posttrial motion after he was found guilty of indirect criminal contempt. On appeal, Suski argues that the trial court erred in (1) denying his motion to dismiss the contempt proceeding; (2) ruling that his affirmative defenses of statute of limitations, laches, equitable estoppel, “void for vagueness,” lack of jurisdiction, unclean hands, and mootness did not apply and were not proven; (3) denying him a trial by jury; (4) denying his Rule 237(b) (166 Ill. 2d R. 237 (b)) notice to appear at…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. People v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Illinois Graphics Co. v. NickumIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Zedella v. GibsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Vaughn v. SpeakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
  5. People v. WarrenIllinois Supreme Court · 1996

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Pelak v. Indiana Industrial Services, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Village of Roselle v. Commonwealth Edison Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  4. City of Marengo v. PollackAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Bogner v. VilligerAppellate Court of Illinois · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API