Legal Opinion
Murphy v. Serial Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided June 8, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMaxwell Shapiro, J.
This controversy was submitted to the court for its determination upon an agreed statement of facts. The facts so far as they are relevant and material are as follows:
For over 19 years prior to April 3, 1959, the plaintiff was in the employ of the defendant Serial Federal Savings & Loan Association of New York City (hereinafter referred to as the “ defendant association ”) first as an office boy and then as an assistant bookkeeper, teller and cashier in that order. On April 3,1959, the plaintiff was discharged by the defendant association for the alleged defalcation of its funds.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gerka v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
- Solicitor for the Affairs of His Majesty's Treasury v. Bankers Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Carr v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.New York Court of Appeals · 1947
- Hoffman v. NaglerCity of New York Municipal Court · 1954
- Harkow v. New York City Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re RubinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Kwoczka v. Dry Dock Savings BankCivil Court of the City of New York · 1966
- B.L.H. Realty Corp. v. CruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1975