Legal Opinion
Fulfillment Services Inc. v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 9, 2008No. 06-15970, 07-15006PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:
The Interstate Commerce Act (“ICA”) was adopted to bring uniformity to shipping regulations previously governed by inconsistent state laws. George W. Wright, Slouching Toward a Morass: The Case For Preserving Complete Carmack Pre-emption, 1 DePaul Bus. & Com. L.J. 177 (2003). Historically, the Interstate Commerce Commission had responsibility for enforcing the ICA. Continuing the deregulation initiatives begun in the 1970s and early 1980s, in 1995 Congress passed the Interstate Commerce Termination Act (“Termination Act”), which abolished the Interstate Commerce…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Flast v. CohenSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Association of Data Processing Service Organizations, Inc. v. CampSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Sternberg v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Thomas Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Edwards v. First American Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Owner-Operator Independent Drivers Ass'n v. Swift Transportation Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Opperman v. Path, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.