Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Board of County Commissioners

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 11, 1963No. [No. 121, September Term, 1963.]PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHammond, J.

The appeal is from a summary judgment in favor of Anne Arundel County for failure of the plaintiff to comply with the statutory provisions for the giving of notice to a county or other municipality as a prerequisite to claiming or suing for “unliquidated damages for any injury or damage to person or property.” Code (1957), Art. 57, Sec. 18, as read by Neuenschwander v. Wash. San. Com., 187 Md. 67, 76, provides that as a condition precedent to the maintenance of a successful claim or of suit against a municipality, the claimant or his representative must, within ninety days of the occurrence,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Teresta v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Neuenschwander v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1946

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Rios v. Montgomery CountyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  2. Prince George's County v. LongtinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  3. Williams v. MaynardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  4. Simpson v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1991
  5. Faulk v. EwingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API