Legal Opinion

Jeswald v. Hutt

Mahoning County Court of Common Pleas

Decided April 11, 1966No. 175258Published

1Opinion of the CourtRigelhaupt, J.

This day this cause came on for hearing on the motion of the defendants filed herein, for judgment nothwithstanding the verdict.

On consideration of the evidence, it is the opinion of this court that the motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict is well taken.

The claim of the plaintiff was: (1) That there were no lights in the parking lot maintained by the defendants; (2) that there was an accumulation of ice and snow on said parking lot which had not been removed by the defendants; (3) that there was a “hump” in the parking lot.

Prom an examination of the entire record, it is…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. J.C. Penny Co. v. RobinsonOhio Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Helms v. James Dickey Post No. 23, American Legion, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1966
  3. McKinley v. NiederstOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Turoff v. RichmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Wise v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1953

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API