Legal Opinion

Taggares v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 13, 1998No. D027874PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WORK, Acting P. J.

The issue before us involves a sua sponte court appointment of a privately compensated discovery referee to resolve an uncomplicated discovery dispute and all future ones which may arise, in which defendants were ordered to assume responsibility for all reference fees because plaintiff is indigent.

I

Trial courts utilize discovery references to reduce: the tension between contentious discovery disputants; burgeoning caseloads; and the perception that time constraints require directing judicial priorities elsewhere. Code of Civil Procedure 1 sections 639 and 645.1…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McDonald v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. DeBlase v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Jameson v. DestaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Woodside Homes of California, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Peter v. Progressive Corp.Alaska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. TJX Companies, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API