Legal Opinion

Lundberg v. Hemphill

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 15, 1931No. Appeal 93PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

CunninGHAM, J.,

The action below was trespass in which plaintiff sought to recover from Anthony Hemphill as landlord and J. G. Griggs as constable, under the Act of March 21, 1772,. 1 Sm. Laws 370, twice the value of an automobile alleged to have been illegally distrained and sold. Judgment was entered for defendants upon questions of law raised by them in their affidavit of defense and plaintiff has appealed. No appearance was entered or brief filed for appellees. The case must be disposed of solely upon the declaration and affidavit. We pay no attention to the extraneous facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Troop v. Franklin Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  2. Esterly Machine Co. v. SpencerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
  3. Ramsdell v. SeybertSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  4. Caldcleugh v. HollingsworthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1844

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. W. W. Grainger, Inc. v. RuthSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  2. Carns v. MatthewsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  3. Huffman v. HuffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  4. Scott v. Zuroski, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Lackawanna County1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API