Legal Opinion

St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Amerada Hess Corp.

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 1, 1979No. Civ. 9532PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company appeals from a summary judgment in favor of Amerada Hess Corporation. St. Paul Company, as subrogee of KBM Well Service, Inc., sought to recover from Amer-ada for damages to a well service derrick owned by KBM. The derrick was insured by St. Paul Company, which paid KBM $46,250.00 for damages to the derrick. 1 The district court held that St. Paul Company was not entitled to recover because of a “waiver of negligence” provision contained in the well service contract between Amera-da and KBM. We reverse.

The facts surrounding the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Albers v. NoDak Racing Club, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Dobler v. MalloyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1973
  3. National Garment Co. v. New York, C. & St. LR Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1949
  4. Dangerfield v. MarkelNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Zuraff v. Empire Fire & Marine Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Bruno, D., Aplts. v. Erie InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Olander Contracting Co. v. Gail Wachter InvestmentsNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Oakes Farming Ass'n v. Martinson Bros.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Latendresse v. LatendresseNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Universal Underwriters Insurance v. A. Richard Kacin, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2007

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API