Legal Opinion

Brown v. Warner

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 30, 1909No. Docket No. 123PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Case made from Cass; Des Voignes, J. Assumpsit by Charles E. Brown against Albert L. Warner for money had and received. A judgment for plaintiff is reviewed by defendant on a case made.

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

The plaintiff and one Isaac N. Snyder were the owners of adjoining farms, between which there was a line fence which was out of repair. Mr. Snyder applied to the fence viewers, under chapter 83, 1 Comp. Laws (sections 2415-2438), to require plaintiff to rebuild his portion of the fence. The fence viewers directed the plaintiff to rebuild his portion, which he refused to do, and it was afterwards built by Mr. Snyder. The fence *275viewers reported to the supervisor of the township, who spread the tax upon the assessment roll. In due course the tax roll and warrant were delivered to the defendant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Anderson v. HillMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Moss v. CummingsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. Dawson v. Township of AureliusMichigan Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Cox v. WelcherMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Taylor v. Township of AvonMichigan Supreme Court · 1889

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brooks v. County of OaklandMichigan Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API