Gearing v. Kelly
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Dissent
Eager, J. (dissenting).
I would affirm on the opinion of Mr. Justice Hecht at Special Term. The provision of the by-laws that a “ majority of the directors shall constitute a quorum ”, is, of course, to be construed with due regard to the context, as a whole, of the section in which it is used. Immediately following, as it does, the opening sentence of the section providing for a board of directors of four, such provision for a majority to constitute a quorum clearly bespeaks a majority of a board of four. Furthermore, the Appellate Division in the Fourth Department has recently held that ‘ ‘…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Angerosa v. White Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
- Angerosa v. White CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1937
- Lawrence v. . American National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Troy Union Railroad v. City of TroyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929
- Troy Union Railroad Company v. City of TroyNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.