Legal Opinion

Callahan v. Stanley

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1881No. 6,771PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff, and an order denying a new trial, in the Third District Court for Alameda County. McKee, J.

1Opinion of the Court

McKee, J.:

This was an action to recover damages for unlawfully preventing the plaintiff from pasturing his sheep upon certain stubble, to wit: the growth of wheat, oats, and barley remaining after harvest time upon the cultivated and uncultivated portions of a certain tract of land which the assignor of the plaintiff had leased to the defendant.

It appears that on the 28th of October, 1876, one Aurrecochea leased to the defendant for the farming season to end *478October 1st, 1877, about eight hundred and forty acres of land in the County of Alameda. By the terms of the lease, the defendant…

2Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G. W. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co.California Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Beneficial Fire & Casualty Insurance v. Kurt Hitke & Co.California Supreme Court · 1956
  3. Ermolieff v. R. K. O. Radio Pictures, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Gibson v. De La Salle InstituteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Brewer v. Horst and Lachmund Co.California Supreme Court · 1900

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API