Legal Opinion

Doe v. Duling

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

Decided February 7, 1986No. 85-1326PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILKINSON, Circuit Judge:

Plaintiffs brought suit under the pseudonyms Jane Doe and James Doe challenging the constitutionality of Virginia statutes prohibiting fornication and cohabitation. Va.Code §§ 18.2-344, 18.2-345 (1982). The district court granted both injunctive and declaratory relief on the grounds that these statutes violated plaintiffs’ rights to privacy. Doe v. Duling, 603 F.Supp. 960 (E.D. Va.1985). Plaintiffs, however, failed to show even a remote chance that they are threatened with prosecution under these provisions. To adjudge this fanciful dispute would undermine the proper…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and State, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  4. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  5. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. National Rifle Ass'n of America v. MagawCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. Navegar, Incorporated and Penn Arms, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  3. Sánchez v. Secretario de JusticiaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2002
  4. Seegars, Sandra v. Ashcroft, JohnCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
  5. Mobil Oil Corporation v. Attorney General of the Commonwealth of Virginia, and Commissioner of Agriculture and Consumer Services of VirginiaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1991

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API