Legal Opinion
Deere & Co. v. Zahm
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 14, 1993No. 2:93-cv-02139PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
LUNGSTRUM, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the motion of defendants Clark Zahm and James Guy to dismiss plaintiffs first amended complaint (Doc. #29). The plaintiff, Deere & Company (“Deere”), claims the defendants were part of a conspiracy to defraud it by knowingly permitting their names to be forged on promissory notes and security agreements in favor of Deere. Plaintiff also brings claims of negligence as well as ratification of the forgeries and execution of the note. Plaintiff seeks punitive damages on the fraud-related claim. Defendants seek…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Durre v. DempseyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1989
- Theatre Enterprises, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- H. Wayne Palmer & Associates v. Heldor Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1993
- Western Reserve Life Assurance Co. of Ohio v. CONREAL LLCDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 2010
- Capital Solutions, LLC v. Konica Minolta Business Solutions U.S.A., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- Vance Ex Rel. Wood v. Midwest Coast Transport, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2004
- Indy Lube Investments, L.L.C. v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.