Legal Opinion

Stumpf v. Allied Equipment & Leasing Co.

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Mifflin County

Decided July 10, 1975No. 182Published

1Opinion of the Court

ZIEGLER, P. J.,

After jury verdict in favor of plaintiff, defendant filed a motion for new trial assigning four stereotyped reasons and three additional reasons which could be analyzed by minimal transcription of record. Thereby, defendant moved the court to direct transcription of *263record and to allow defendant to file additional reasons after transcription. Accordingly, we directed transcription by decree of June 27, 1974, “at the expense of defendant.” Defendant moved to modify decree of June 27, 1974, by excluding the requirement of payment prior to argument on former motion. Defendant, as…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Boddie v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Lindsey v. NormetSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. United States v. KrasSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Giaccio v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Ortwein v. SchwabSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API