Legal Opinion

In Re the Personal Restraint of Akridge

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 8, 1978No. 45162PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.

This action involves personal restraint petitions by three penitentiary inmates. Because the petitions raised first impression issues, this court heard the petitions rather than transferring to the Court of Appeals, which is the usual practice. RAP 16.5(b).

Petitioners had been convicted of felonies, served time and were paroled. While on parole each was convicted of one or more felonies. The Board of Prison Terms and Paroles (board), without a revocation hearing, revoked parole, set minimum terms for the parole violations, set the starting date for the subsequent conviction to be after the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State v. DupardWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  2. In Re the Personal Restraint of LehmanWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  3. In Re the Personal Restraint of SinkaWashington Supreme Court · 1979
  4. In Re the Personal Restraint of BooneWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Ex Parte WilliamsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1987

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API