Empire City Job Print, Inc. v. Harbord
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the CourtTownley, J.
Plaintiff brings this action to recover for goods sold and delivered. The underlying transaction involves two orders given by defendant Falk in October, 1929, on behalf of the Republican-Fusion committee, for banners to be put on automobiles *7advocating the election of certain Fusion candidates. The defendants Baldwin and Winter were active members of this committee. At the trial without any exception or further requests by the plaintiff, the case was left to the jury on the following issue: “ The mere fact that the plaintiff sold a bill of goods does not prove his case here. You must find…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- McCabe v. . GoodfellowNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Hale v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
3Cited by6 opinions
- Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Pinsky v. Pikesville Recreation CouncilCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2013
- Richmond Advertising/Reinhold Associates, Inc. v. Del GiudiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
- 96 Fifth Avenue Realty Corp. v. GreenbergCity of New York Municipal Court · 1943
- Xerox Corp. v. RinfretCivil Court of the City of New York · 1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.