Legal Opinion

Xerox Corp. v. Rinfret

Civil Court of the City of New York

Decided October 20, 1992PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Louis B. York, J.

Pierre Rinfret, who waged a colorful, but unsuccessful campaign for Governor several years ago, is now sued by one of the creditors of that campaign. He is sued both in his individual capacity and as doing business as Citizens for Pierre Rinfret. Because Mr. Rinfret has not been shown to have ever agreed to assume the debts of his campaign committee, his motion for summary judgment dismissing this action is granted.

The exhibits attached to Rinfret’s motion to dismiss reveal 13 invoices from the instant plaintiff addressed to "Citizens for Rinfret.” A…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hale v. HirschAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1923
  2. Empire City Job Print, Inc. v. HarbordAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1935
  3. Richmond Advertising/Reinhold Associates, Inc. v. Del GiudiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karl Rove & Company v. Richard Thornburgh, Richard Thornburgh, Cross-Appellee, and Raymond P. Dimuzio, Defendant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API