Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 19, 1997No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted the motion of third-party defendant, 7-7, Inc. (7-7), and the cross motion of defendant, Bethlehem Steel Corporation (Bethlehem), for summary judgment dismissing the Labor Law § 240 (1) and § 241 (6) claims. The record establishes that, pursuant to a blanket agreement entered into on May 17, 1990, 7-7 agreed to provide ongoing hazardous waste disposal services at Bethlehem’s plant. The agreement provided that Bethlehem would identify the hazardous waste to be handled, processed and disposed of by 7-7 by…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Misseritti v. Mark IV Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Jock v. FienNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- Rodriguez v. Margaret Tietz Center for Nursing Care, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1994
- Groves v. Land's End Housing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goad v. Southern Electric International, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Lamm v. LoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998