Legal Opinion

Tschetter v. Hofer

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1930No. File No. 7080PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, P. J.

To an obviously sufficient complaint on a promissory note defendant demurred on the ground that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action.

Plaintiff moved for judgment on the pleadings. The court denied the motion, overruled! the demurrer, and gave defendant ten days in which to answer. Within that time defendant answered, pleading, among other defenses, several counterclaims, which, if proven, would offset the greater part of the note. Plaintiff admitted due service of the answer, and, before taking the present appeal from the denial of the motion for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pierson v. Minnehaha CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Schwitz v. ThomasSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Springer v. SwiftSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API