Maibaum v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
DAVIDSON, Presiding Judge.
Appellant was convicted of burglarizing Bluemel’s saloon, his punishment being assessed at three years confinement in the penitentiary.
1. There is a great deal of testimony of an indifferent nature, and collateral matters introduced, and the investigation took a wide range, the statement of facts covering about seventy-five pages of typewritten matter. Boiled down to the essential facts, so far as it relates to appellant, the statement of facts. may be briefly stated as follows: Bluemel’s saloon, or one of the rooms attached to it, was burglarized and an iron safe…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Schwartz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908
3Cited by5 opinions
- Beeson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1910
- Galveston, H. & H. R. v. McLainCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- Garcia v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917
- Nunnally v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
- Bishop v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1912