Legal Opinion

Perske v. Perske

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 9, 1954No. Civ. No. 15847PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Elizabeth Perske, the plaintiff, is the second and present wife of defendant Dr. Frederick Perske, an osteopath. Pearl Perske, a defendant and the cross-complainant, is the first wife of the doctor. Elizabeth brought an action against her husband and Pearl to quiet her title to a lot in Pebble Beach. Pearl responded with a cross-complaint, charging that the property in question was the property of the doctor, and asked to have a conveyance from the doctor to • Elizabeth set aside as in fraud of creditors, and the property made subject to a lien held by Pearl for alimony and child support. The…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  4. Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
  5. La Jolla Casa deManana v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Camp v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
  2. O'KEEFE v. Aptos Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API