Perske v. Perske
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.
Elizabeth Perske, the plaintiff, is the second and present wife of defendant Dr. Frederick Perske, an osteopath. Pearl Perske, a defendant and the cross-complainant, is the first wife of the doctor. Elizabeth brought an action against her husband and Pearl to quiet her title to a lot in Pebble Beach. Pearl responded with a cross-complaint, charging that the property in question was the property of the doctor, and asked to have a conveyance from the doctor to • Elizabeth set aside as in fraud of creditors, and the property made subject to a lien held by Pearl for alimony and child support. The…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Gudelj v. GudeljCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Huber v. HuberCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Estate of HarrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Kinnison v. Guaranty Liquidating Corp.California Supreme Court · 1941
- La Jolla Casa deManana v. HopkinsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Camp v. OrtegaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- O'KEEFE v. Aptos Land & Water Co.California Court of Appeal · 1955