Legal Opinion

Klein v. Ronstadt

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 6, 1986No. 2 CA-CIV 5450PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HOWARD, Presiding Judge.

This was an action for declaratory and injunctive relief wherein appellant sought to enjoin the Tucson Police Department from initiating sobriety check points. The case was heard by the trial court, sitting without a jury. The evidence at trial disclosed that appellant had never been stopped at a sobriety check point, does not drive while he is under the influence of alcohol and is not a resident of the City of Tucson. He asserted that he was intimidated by the possibility that he might at some future time encounter a sobriety cheek point. The trial court, while…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. State v. Super. Ct. in & for County of PimaArizona Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Arizona State Board of Directors for Junior Colleges v. Phoenix Union High School DistrictArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Lake Havasu Resort v. COMMERCIAL LOAN INS.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. Merritt-Chapman & Scott Corporation v. FrazierArizona Supreme Court · 1962

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Playtex Family Products, Inc. v. St. Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1989
  2. Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  3. Citibank (Ariz.) v. Miller & Schroeder Fin., Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  4. ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  5. Montelongo-Morales v. DriscollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API