Legal Opinion

Gentry v. Sinclair

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided September 15, 2008No. Case C99-0289LPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING RESPONDENT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, DENYING PETITIONER’S CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND ORDER DENYING AMENDED HABEAS PETITION

ROBERT S. LASNIK, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

This matter comes before the Court on “Respondent’s Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 272) and Jonathan Lee Gentry’s (“petitioner” or “Gentry”) “Cross Motion for Summary Judgment” (Dkt. # 275). On September 8, 2008, the Court held oral argument on the motions and heard from both parties’ counsel. For the reasons set forth below, the Court grants respondent’s motion for summary judgment,…

2Cases cited93 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  5. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000

88 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Lowe v. SwansonDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2009
  2. United States v. SedilloDistrict Court, D. New Mexico · 2017
  3. Gentry v. SinclairDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2009
  4. Clement v. AmesDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2021
  5. Millow v. Warden, London Correctional InstitutionDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API