Legal Opinion

Meng v. Coffee

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1897No. 7323PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from the district court of Sioux county. Heard below before Bartow, J.

1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.

The appellant herein commenced this action in the district court of Sioux county to secure an injunction by which the appellees would be restrained from appropriating and using the waters of Hat creek for irrigation, and thereby, it was alleged, depriving him of his rights in and to the use and enjoyment of such waters. A temporary injunction was granted, answers were filed, issues joined, and the case was heard. The trial judge filed “Special findings of law and facts,” and made the following order: “The order of the court is that as to the defendants Coffee, Brewster, Wilcox, and Steele…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Scofield v. State National BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1878
  2. Bartram v. ShermanNebraska Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Browne v. Edwards & McCullough Lumber Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1895
  4. School District No. 15 v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Barkley v. PoolNebraska Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Waite v. City of OmahaNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
  3. Ramaekers v. Creighton UniversityNebraska Supreme Court · 2022
  4. Young v. City of AlbionNebraska Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API