Legal Opinion

Batsell v. Richards

Texas Supreme Court

Decided April 14, 1891No. 7003PublishedCited by 4 opinions

The opinion gives a statement.

1Opinion of the Court

STAYTON, Chief Justice.

It appears that W. E. Tarr and T. J. Rewcome were partners in a mercantile business, and that the former died on January 4, 1874, the firm at that time being solvent, although considerably indebted. Rewcome administered on the estate of Tarr, which consisted solely of his interest in the firm assets, and after appropriating one-half of the entire assets of the firm to his own use, Rewcome inventoried the residue as property of the estate of Tarr.

Appellants Batsell and Dugan became sureties on the bond executed by Rewcome as administrator, who continued to act until…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bonney v. SeelyNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  2. Eaton v. LambertNebraska Supreme Court · 1871
  3. Martindale v. BrockCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1875

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Faires v. CockerellTexas Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Drake v. Trinity Universal Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Gaines v. GainesCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. American Surety Co. v. First Nat. Bank of CorsicanaCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API