Martindale v. Brock
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Appeal from the Superior Court of Baltimore City. The case is very fully stated in the opinion of the Court. The appeal was taken from the judgment by default, and the extension of the same ; and from the order and opinion of the Court filed 2nd of February, 1874, refusing to strike out the said judgment, and from the opinion and judgment of the Court filed 21st of April, 1874, overruling the motion to strike out the entry to the use of .George H. Dobson.
1Opinion of the CourtBartol, C. J.
On the 5th day of December, 1873, a suit was instituted in the name of William E. Brock against George H. Dob-son and Franklin G. Martindale, upon their bond, for the penal sum of $20,000, conditioned for the performance by said Martindale and one James W. Krepps of certain covenants contained in Articles of Agreement entered into between Brock of the one part, and Martindale and Krepps of the other part. The condition of the bond, and the covenants in the Articles of .Agreement are set out in the declaration, and need not be particularly mentioned here.
*577The defendants were both summoned and…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Batsell v. RichardsTexas Supreme Court · 1891
- Central Teresa Sugar Co. of Maryland v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928
- Central Teresa Sugar Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1928