Legal Opinion

Rundell v. Farmers' Co-operative Elevator Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1920No. Docket No. 35PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Shiawassee; Collins (Joseph H.), J. Assumpsit in justice’s court by Joseph Rundell against the Farmers’ Co-operative Elevator Company of Corunna for breach of a contract of employment. There was judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appealed to the circuit court. Judgment for defendant on a directed verdict. Plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtShaepe, J.

The defendant is organized under Act No. 35, Public Acts of 1899 (3 Comp. Laws 1915, §§ 11311-11320), under which only those' engaged as “fruit growers and farmers” may become members. After incorporation, the association is required by the act to “make and adopt all needful by-laws for its government,” including such as “may be deemed necessary for the management” of its affairs.

Section 3 of article 5 of the constitution and bylaws reads:

“The board of directors may hire a general manager and such other ^person or persons as they deem necessary to carry on the business of the corporation, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Union Mutual Life Insurance v. WhiteIllinois Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Schmand v. JandorfMichigan Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Hallenbeck v. Powers & Walker Casket Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Webster v. JossmanMichigan Supreme Court · 1917

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Harley v. Hartford Fruit Growers & Farmers ExchangeMichigan Supreme Court · 1921

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API