Harley v. Hartford Fruit Growers & Farmers Exchange
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Van Burén; DesVoignes (L. Burget), J. Assumpsit by Lee Harley and another against the Hartford Fruit Growers & Farmers Exchange for goods sold and delivered. Judgment for plaintiffs. Defendant brings error.
1DissentBird, J.
Plaintiffs claim they sold *148710 bushels of Duchess apples to defendant in August, 1919, at $2.25 a bushel, and delivered the same to the defendant in a railroad car at Hartford. That after-wards they received $400 on account thereof, leaving a balance of $1,197.50. They sue to recover this balance.
The defendant is said to be a corporation. Its method of operation is to receive, pack and sell the fruit of its members and at the end of the season it deducts 5 per cent, of the gross, income for services and prorates the balance among its members. Growers of fruit, who are not members, may put…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
- People v. LipsczinskaMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
- Hallenbeck v. Powers & Walker Casket Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
- Rundell v. Farmers' Co-operative Elevator Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920