Commonwealth ex rel. Travitzky v. Travitzky
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Hoffman, J.,
Appellant contends that a support order for her five children is inadequate and that the lower court erred *437in failing to take into consideration the separate earnings of the appellee’s second wife.
The parties, now divorced, are the parents of six minor children, one of whom resides with the appelleefather. For the past four years, the appellee voluntarily paid child support, starting with payments of $200.00 a week, and gradually reducing said payments to $100.00 a week. Believing this amount to be inadequate, the appellant instituted support proceedings in the Court of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Conway v. DanaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
- White v. WhiteSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Jones v. JonesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
- Commonwealth ex rel. Yeats v. YeatsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951
- Commonwealth ex rel. Hoffman v. HoffmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Melzer v. WitsbergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Barrett v. BarrettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- López v. RodríguezSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1988
- Chévere Mouriño v. Levis GoldsteinSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 2000
- Fee v. FeeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.