Legal Opinion

Van Knight v. Smoker

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 18, 2000No. 1981238PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiffs, Mary Van Knight and Gaye F. Garnett, as conservators of the estate of Helen H. Fillingim, non compos mentis, appeal from the trial judge's summary judgment in favor of the defendants, Piggly Wiggly Corporation; Piggly Wiggly Alabama Distributing Company, Inc.; Smoker, Inc.; Gregory A. Smoker; H. Grady Smith; and Virginia Smith. The only issue raised by the plaintiffs is whether the trial judge erred in conducting a hearing on November 18, 1998, on the defendants' motions for summary judgment in the absence of the plaintiffs and their attorneys, C. Knox McLaney III and John…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pate v. Rollison Logging Equipment, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  2. Sparks v. Alabama Power Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Williams v. TylerAlabama Court of Appeals · 1916
  4. Tharp v. Union State BankCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1978
  5. Givens v. General Motors Acceptance CorporationCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Moore v. Prudential Residential ServicesSupreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  2. Giles v. Brookwood Health Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  3. Burgoon v. ALA. STATE DEPT. OF HUMAN RES.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2002
  4. Bill Salter Advtg. v. City of Atmore, 2090639 (ala.civ.app. 10-22-2010)Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  5. Mountain Lakes District v. Oak Grove Methodist Church ex rel. GreenCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2013

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API