Legal Opinion

State Bank of Hardinsburg v. Brown

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 18, 1943No. 23PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts

The court below has construed § 75 (n) of the Bankruptcy Act1 as bringing within the court’s jurisdiction property mortgaged by the debtor as to which, after foreclosure, the debtor’s equity of redemption had expired.2 Because of conflict of decision3 we granted certiorari.

*136Subsequent to the adoption of § 75 the respondents borrowed $2,500 from the petitioner and gave a promissory-note secured by mortgage on their farm in Indiana. In a foreclosure proceeding in an Indiana state court petitioner obtained judgment November 20, 1939, ordering that the property be sold to satisfy the debt. May 25,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Jessup v. CareyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Hubble v. BerryIndiana Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Glenn v. HollumsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1935
  5. Shreiner v. Farmers' Trust Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. In Re W. F. Hurley, Inc., Debtor. Employment Security Division, Arkansas Department of Labor v. W. F. Hurley, Inc., and Robert P. Lindsey, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
  2. In Re RouseUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Vanjani v. Federal Land Bank of LouisvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. New England Bank & Trust Co. v. Loubier (In Re Loubier)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1980
  5. Jelks v. Aetna Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1943

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API