Legal Opinion

Watson v. Poole

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided December 15, 1997No. 2768PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HEARN, Judge:

These cross-appeals arise from a child custody and visitation dispute between Felicia Watson (Mother) and Angus Poole (Father). The family court’s final order provided that custody remain with Mother, that Father continue his visitation rights, and that Mother pay $2,000 in attorney fees and $1,000 in Guardian ad Litem fees. We affirm as modified in part, reverse in part, and remand.

J. FACTS

Mother initiated this action in February 1996 seeking to terminate or restrict Father’s visitation rights, alleging he had sexually abused their four-year-old daughter, Anne Marie. Father…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Glasscock v. GlasscockSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1991
  2. E.D.M. v. T.A.M.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1992
  3. Stevenson v. StevensonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1988
  4. Wilson v. WilsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  5. Barnett v. BarnettCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re MillerSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2011
  2. Noojin v. NoojinCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API