Legal Opinion
Wandtke v. Anderson
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 21, 1934No. 7437PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GARRECHT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is from the decree of the District Court which allowed and approved the findings and conclusions of the Commissioner in determining that appellee Arthur Oakley was not a captain or master of the boat or scow Mary E, but merely an operator, engineer, or stevedore, and as such entitled to priority over certain other claimants.
The Mary E was a motorboat of 67 gross tons, 48 net tons, 60.1 feet in length, 25.8 feet in width, 6.2 feet in depth, and the crew as required called for but one man.
The Mary E was engaged in transporting freight between San Francisco…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Warner v. GoltraSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- The Steamboat Orleans v. PhœbusSupreme Court of the United States · 1837
- The J. S. WardenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1910
- The BalsaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Scott v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Captain Tom Barber v. The Motor Vessel "Blue Cat", a 32' Catamaran, Her Engines, Apparel, Tackle and EquipmentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1967
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. LawsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1938
- Gale v. Union Bag & Paper CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Vlavianos v. the CypressCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1948
- Ayers v. Oceanic & Oriental Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.